Legal Opinion
Daniel George Panagos v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1963No. 7412_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was charged with falsely pretending to be an officer of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 912. At his arraignment on June 29, 1961, he entered a plea of guilty, and was advised that a probation officer would prepare a presentence investigation. On July 20, 1961, the appellant next appeared, and was sentenced pursuant to the Federal Youth Corrections Act.
The appellant thereafter filed an application and motion pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2255, on the ground that at the time of sentencing he was not advised of his right to have counsel. The trial court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Volney Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- People v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. HarigNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Richard A. Sandoval v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.