Legal Opinion

Ohio Lime Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 23, 1963No. Civ. No. C 62-170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLOEB, District Judge.

Plaintiff taxpayer is an Ohio corporation that owns and operates a stone quarry in Woodville, Ohio. In this case it seeks to recover an alleged overpayment of corporate income and excess profits taxes in a substantial sum, together with interest thereon. The taxable years at issue for the purpose of this motion fox-partial summary judgment concerns the years 1950 to 1953, inclusive.

The statute involved is the following: Internal Revenue Code of 1939:

“§ 114. BASIS FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPLETION. ******
“(b) Basis for depletion
“(4) (as amended by Sec. 124(a) of the Revenue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Kansas City v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Virginian Limestone Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  3. United States v. The Wagner Quarries CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  4. Halquist v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  5. Wagner Quarries Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woodville Lime Products Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966
  2. France Stone Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API