Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1939No. Docket No. 79, Calendar No. 40,190PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff filed a bill in equity for the cancellation of a deed given by him to the defendants. Belief was sought on the ground that defendants had breached the contract which constituted the consideration for the deed. From a decree granting the relief prayed the defendants have appealed.

This case is typical of most cases of its class in that it arises out of a transaction that never should have been consummated. Prior to May 15, 1934, plaintiff was the owner of a 40-acre farm in Kingston township, Tuscola county. There was a comfortable dwelling on the place and other reasonably suitable…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Low v. LowMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Banks v. BanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Crofts v. KoepplingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Evans v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Randall v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API