Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Guy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1992No. 91-0708-CRPublished

1Dissent

HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE

(dissenting). I dissent from the majority opinion upholding Officer Zarse's frisk of Guy absent a particularized suspicion that Guy was armed and posed a danger to the police. The majority justifies its relaxed reading of the fourth amendment on the high incidence of drug related violence. While fully mindful of the enormity of the drug related problem that confronts this country's police officers, I nonetheless disagree with the majority's utter disregard for the state and federal constitutions' prohibition of unjustified governmental intrusions upon the rights of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. State v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API