Legal Opinion

Ex Parte John P. Coble, 2091087 (ala.civ.app. 5-6-2011)

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 6, 2011No. 2091087PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

John P. Coble, the plaintiff below, appealed from an order of the Madison Circuit Court striking his demand for a jury trial. Because an order granting or denying a trial by jury is an interlocutory order properly reviewed by a petition for a writ of mandamus, see Ex parte SouthTrust Bank of Alabama, N.A., 679 So.2d 645, 647 (Ala.1996), we have elected to treat the appeal as a petition for a writ of mandamus. See Fowler v. Merkle, 564 So.2d 960, 961 (Ala.Civ.App.1989) (stating that this court has the discretion to treat an appeal from an unappealable order as a petition for a writ of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. BrunoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glasgow v. Jackson Land Surveying, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  2. C.M.P. v. D.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API