Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Reuter

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1933No. File No. 6107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nuessle, Ch. J.

This action is brought to recover on a written instrument in words and figures, as follows:

The notation on the margin Given as collateral for notes and settlement of Mathias Neuter with H. D. Cassidy/’ is in the handwriting of the defendant.

The complaint is in the usual form for recovery on a negotiable instrument. The defendant, answering, first interposes a general denial and then pleads that the instrument was a guaranty agreement to cover a debt of Mathias Neuter to the plaintiff, executed at the request of the plaintiff as additional security with the understanding that it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Red River Valley National Bank v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schnell v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Wadeson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hermanson v. MorrellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API