Legal Opinion

Nauman v. Nauman

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 14, 2018No. CV–17–297Published

1Opinion of the Court

Michael filed a motion to reconsider on December 7, 2016. In it he argued that the circuit court failed to consider or make findings regarding Rene's financial need and that the circuit court impermissibly automatically escalated alimony at the end of four years. Michael also appealed the circuit court's division of the rights to the stock awards as marital property. He argued that Brady has the right to unilaterally deny Michael these benefits; thus, he does not have enforceable contract rights to the stock awards.

The court did not rule on the motion to reconsider, and it was deemed denied.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Hackett v. HackettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Kuchmas v. KuchmasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API