Legal Opinion

Rakhil Felshina v. Richard Schweiker, as Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 13, 1983No. 741, Docket 82-6245PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Rakhil Felshina applied for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits under Sub-chapter XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-83 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980) and was denied. Representing herself, Felshina exhausted her administrative reme*72dies. Represented by the Community Action for Legal Services, she filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York seeking review of the Secretary’s decision that Felshina was not disabled as defined by the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1382c(a)(3)(A), and accompanying regulations. Judge Eugene Nickerson…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James Mizell v. The Attorney General of the State of New York and Ano.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Roza Kolodnay v. Richard Schweiker, as Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Rodgers v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Claire McDonald v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  2. Wayne Paul Burkett v. Richard Cunningham, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Edna Johnson v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Bailey v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Dixon v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API