State v. Rojas
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Ronald Rojas, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of criminal violation of a protective order in *354violation of General Statutes § 53a-223 (a).1 The defendant claims that the evidence did not support the jury’s verdict. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On the basis of the evidence presented at trial, the jury reasonably could have found that the defendant and Alima Bryant had been in a romantic relationship for several years prior to June, 2007. During their relationship, the defendant and Bryant resided together in East Haven…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. HedgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. OsimantiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. MoodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FrancioneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. RojasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011