Legal Opinion

J. R. Watkins Co. v. Bankston

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeche, J.

This case was remanded for the purpose of taking evidence on the question of acquiescence in the judgment, which acquiescence was pleaded as a ground for dismissal of defendants’ appeal.

Instead of taking evidence, the parties have agreed in writing, “that the motion to dismiss and plea of acquiescence be withdrawn and that the case be submitted on the question of validity of the contract sued in this case”.

The judgment appealed from was obtained on a confirmation of default. The record contains no note of evidence, but we must assume that the trial judge did not permit the default to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. BradleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. City of Shreveport v. MarounSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. Wilson v. Ivy Lodge, No. 93, K. P.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mattern v. City of N. O.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. J. R. Watkins Co. v. RachalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API