Legal Opinion
World Marketing, Ltd., a Corporation v. Ronald Hallam and Does I Through X
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1979No. 77-2937PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff World Marketing Corporation appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California denying remand to the Superior Court of California and dismissing with prejudice a quiet title action against defendant Ronald Hallam. The district court denied remand because it considered 26 U.S.C. § 7426 (1976) as the exclusive remedy for recovery of property wrongfully seized and sold by the United States. Jurisdiction is conferred on this court by 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1966). We reverse and remand.
I. FACTS
James W. Philbee transferred…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Manuel Flores and Wilshire Insurance Company, Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. United States of America, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Crow v. Wyoming Timber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Mildred Babb v. Frank S. Schmidt, District Director of Internal Revenue and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Omnibus Financial Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United Sand and Gravel Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Earl Winebrenner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- United States v. FontanaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Newport National Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.