Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Bland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Hendricks Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action of replevin by the appellee against the appellant for a certain mare and colt. Trial by the Court; finding and judgment for the plaintiff in respect to the mare, a motion for a new trial being overruled.

The material facts involved are as follows: Mrs. Clifford, in her lifetime, was the owner by devise (not, how*177ever, to her separate use) of a certain piece of real estate, which she, together with her husband, John Clifford, conveyed to one Weathered, in exchange for the mare in qnestion. John received the mare, and kept her for some time, and then sold her to the defendant.

<7…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parrett v. PalmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Abshire v. State ex rel. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Fogleman v. ShivelyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Johnson v. RunyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Ireland v. WebberIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API