Trexler v. Kuntz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 22, Oct. T., 1907, by-defendants, from decree of C. P. Lehigb Co., June T., 1905, No. 2, on bill in equity in case of Harry C. Trexler et al., trading as Trexler Lumber Company, v. Laura M. Kuntz et al. and Jacob W. Grim et al., trading as Grim Brothers. Bill in equity for an account and to declare priority. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
Cyrus Kuntz, being thy oWner of a lot in the cRy of Allentown, on May 23,1903, entered into a contract wi|H0L J. Meixell for the erection of a building thereon, the contract containing a stipulation that no., mechanic’s lien, should be filed against said building for work done or material furnished in and about the erection of the same, which said agreement was entqred_ofrecord in the office of the prothonotary of Lehigh county on the day of its execution, and was duly indexed as required by law. Meixell at once began the work of erecting the building, which was in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. BogertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Cook v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Vulcanite Portland Cement Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Johnston v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Phillips's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.