Legal Opinion

Beckham v. Cayton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1924No. 77PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, C. J.

Appellee, W. K. Cay-ton, sued appellant, J. J. Beckham, and Jim Henson to recover the sum of $250. Henson was dismissed from the suit before trial and need not be further considered as a party to the suit. Appellee alleged as a basis for the recovery sought by him that, at the time of the transactions involved in this suit, he was engaged in procuring purchasers for and making sales of land and oil, gas and mineral leases for others; that Jim Henson was agent and attorney in fact for appellant; that said Henson, acting for appellant, being desirous of selling an oil and gas lease on a certain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Fordtran v. StowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Collins & Douglas v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McFadden v. FritzIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Baldwin v. PoltiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horne Zoological Arena Co. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Simmons v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Douglas v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API