Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bronwell v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1980No. 9015Published

1DissentDodson, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The trial court submitted this case upon three special issues. The first issue inquired of the jury whether Dr. Bronwell “failed to exercise ordinary care when he cut the common bile duct of the Plaintiff, Vivian Williams.” Ordinary care was defined in the charge as “that degree of care which a medical surgeon of ordinary prudence, engaged in the practice of medicine in Lubbock County, Texas, would use under the same or similar circumstances.” The jury answered “we do” to this issue.

By points of error one through four, Dr. Bronwell challenges the court’s submission of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hood v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Brown v. Frontier Theatres, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API