Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. McGrew
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Ray Circuit Court. — Hon. Jas. M. Sandusky, Judge. The defendant was entitled to have the ’ report of the commissioners set aside and a jury trial ordered as a constitutional right. Constitution, art. 12, sec. 4; Stewart v. Baltimore, 7 Md. 500; Bailroad v. Almeroth, 13 Mo. App. 91; Kimbell v. Bailroad, 35 Me. 255; Bailroad v. Story, 96 Mo. 611; People v. McBoberts, 62 111.38; Pursey’s Appeal, 83 Pa. St. 67; Mitchell v. Bailroad, 68 Ill. 286; Turn.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Ray Circuit Court. — Hon. Jas. M. Sandusky, Judge. The defendant was entitled to have the ’ report of the commissioners set aside and a jury trial ordered as a constitutional right. Constitution, art. 12, sec. 4; Stewart v. Baltimore, 7 Md. 500; Bailroad v. Almeroth, 13 Mo. App. 91; Kimbell v. Bailroad, 35 Me. 255; Bailroad v. Story, 96 Mo. 611; People v. McBoberts, 62 111.38; Pursey’s Appeal, 83 Pa. St. 67; Mitchell v. Bailroad, 68 Ill. 286; Turn. Go. v. Burket, 26 Ind. 53; People v. Stewmt, 97 Ill. 123; Isom v. Bailroad, 36 Miss. 300; Bail/road v. Ilock, 118 Ill. 587. The…
1Opinion of the CourtMacfarlaNE, J.
This is a proceeding to condemn a strip of land through a number of lots in the town of Camden, Ray county, belonging to defendant, for right of way of the railroad of plaintiff. Application was made, commissioners appointed and report of commissioners filed, as provided by article 6, chapter 42, Revised Statutes of 1889.
Upon the coming in of the report of the commissioners, plaintiff filed a motion in which was charged that the assessment of the damages was excessive, that the commissioners did not take into consideration the advantages the railroad would be to the remaining land, and that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Randolph Town-Site Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railroad v. StorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- St. Joseph & Iowa Railroad v. ShambaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arkansas-Missouri Power Company v. HamlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Leavenworth Terminal Railway & Bridge Co. v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PfauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- United States v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Southern Missouri & Arkansas Railroad v. WyattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.