Legal Opinion

Austin v. United States

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided September 26, 1941No. 361PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff applies for leave to prosecute her appeal to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals as a poor person. She alleges that she- is a citizen of the United States. However, the record discloses that she is a convict in the state penitentiary, in pursuance of a judgment of conviction for the murder of her husband. Inasmuch as the federal statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 832, fixes as one of the requisites of an allowance to appeal as a poor person that the applicant be a citizen and such provision has been repeatedly held to be a condition precedent to allowance of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. People v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Boyle v. Great Northern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1894
  4. Quittner v. Motion Picture Producers & Distributors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. De Maurez v. SwopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roberts Ex Rel., Inmates of the California State Prison for Men at Represa, Cal. v. State of California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API