Legal Opinion

Highway Patrol v. Neal's Dependents

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1960No. 41570PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*511Ethridge, J.

The Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarded death benefits under the Act to appellees, dependents of Claude C. Neal, deceased. Neal was a highway patrolman, working in the drivers ’ license division, examining applicants for such licenses in several counties. He had a long-standing, severe care of hypertension, and died during working hours from a cerebral hemorrage. The overwhelming weight of the evidence reflects that the activities and duties of his employment aggravated, accelerated, or combined with his pre-exist-ing disease to produce his death. Five doctors who had seen…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Central Electric Power Ass'n v. HicksMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Insurance Dept. of Miss. v. DinsmoreMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Goodnite v. Farm Equipment CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  4. W. G. Avery Body Co. v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Fry v. JORDAN AUTO CO.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kersh v. Greenville Sheet Metal WorksMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  2. L. B. Priester & Son, Inc. v. Dependents of BynumMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  3. LEAKE CTY. COOP.(AAL) v. Dependents of BarrettMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Mississippi State Univ. v. Dependents of HattawayMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Union Producing Co. v. Dependents of SimpsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API