Legal Opinion

In re Lustig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1993No. D83-0059; CA A65625Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Wife appeals from an order modifying a dissolution judgment and denying her motion to increase child support. We affirm.

The parties were married in June, 1978. Their marriage was dissolved in 1983, and wife was awarded custody of their two minor children. The judgment required husband to (1) make child support payments of $175 per month per child; (2) maintain employment-related medical insurance for the children; (3) pay all uninsured medical expenses for the children; and (4) provide term life insurance naming the children as the primary beneficiaries.

In October, 1989, husband sought a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barone v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Matter of Marriage of MoakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. In re the Marriage of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API