Legal Opinion

In re Ignelzi

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1930No. 15282Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This ease was heard on a certificate to review an order of the referee in bankruptcy directing the receiver to return to Gilpin & Hittner, Ine., certain soda fountain fixtures claimed to have been lent to the bankrupt on a bailment.

The reclamation petition was filed in this court by Gilpin & Hittner, Ine., alleging that the said soda fountain fixtures had been leased to the bankrupt on a bailment contract. The receiver answered, denying that the contract was one of bailment, but rather one of conditional sale. This petition and answer were then referred to Watson…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walton v. TepelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API