Legal Opinion

Wesch v. Helburn

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided August 12, 1933No. 1494PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

The sole question in this ease is whether or not the investment of Gustave A. Y/eseh, the deceased taxpayer, in BaneoKentueky stock was a deductible loss for income tax purposes for the taxable year 1930, under section 23 (e) of the Revenue Act'of 1928, 26 USCA § 2023 (e). This section provides that in computing net income there shall be allowed as deductions, in the case of an individual, losses sustained during the taxable year and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise, if incurred in trade or business, or if incurred in any transaction entered into for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Forbes v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  2. In Re HoffmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Glenn v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Schoenhut v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  5. Louisville Trust Co. v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API