Armistead v. State

ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

There is a slight error in our original opinion where it is stated that on direct examination prosecutrix gave evidence favorable to the State but changed her testimony on cross-examination. In fact she did not change her testimony on cross-examination, but the next morning she was called back to the witness stand by appellant and she then retracted all of the criminative evidence given by her theretofore against appellant.

In its motion for rehearing the State urges that evidence introduced by the State supports the child’s testimony first given…