Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 2008No. 4D07-3109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.

Appellant was lawfully in an open convenience store, but then went into an “employees only,” room and took $400. His conviction for burglary of a structure was enhanced to a second degree felony because the structure was occupied. He argues that, because the employees only room was not occupied, the enhancement was error. We agree, because our burglary statute, in light of case law, is unclear as to what is an occupied structure under these facts.

Under our burglary statute, section 810.02(l)(b), entering a structure with the intent to commit an offense therein is a burglary, “unless the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Standard Jury Instructions in Crim. CasesSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. Dakes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. De Albuquerque v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. CruzSuperior Court of Guam · 2014
  2. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API