Legal Opinion

People v. Charlton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not entitled to the imposition of a sanction against the prosecution for its failure to preserve a video segment purporting to show the crimes in progress, which was contained in a private video surveillance system owned by the complainant’s employer and was automatically overwritten by the surveillance system one week later. The lost video segment had never been in the possession of the police or prosecution and, thus, the prosecution did not have an affirmative obligation to preserve this evidence. Moreover, there was no evidence that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Demitrus B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. ZacharyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. B., DEMITRUS, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API