Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 1995No. 93-CF-813PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Senior Judge:

This appeal presents a seizure issue involving the victim of criminal activity who was approached by the police for questioning. Because the conduct of the police officers did constitute a “seizure” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment and because the officers acted without “articulable suspicion,” probable cause, or any other legal justification for the seizure, the motion to suppress should have been granted.

I

Following his indictment for carrying a pistol without a license,1 possession of an unregistered firearm,2 unlawful possession of ammunition,3 unlawful…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Kelby R. Gordon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. ALBERT JONES v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API