Legal Opinion

In re Bassett

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application by petitioner to have designating petitions declared invalid.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The petitioner and the respondent are rival contenders in the Democratic primary for the nomination for alderman in the forty-eighth district, Bings county. The petition which is attacked contains 357 signatures. The law requires but 190. Two hundred and twenty-one of them are challenged and 136 are undisputed.

There are numerous objections, Only the principal *462ones will be mentioned. Sixty-one of the signatures are witnessed by the candidate DeGfrace and his acknowledgment, in due form, before a notary public, is appended. It is contended that a candidate may not act as subscribing witness.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Complaint of McCloskyNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In re the Objections of BulgerNew York Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kerns v. WhitingNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Harte v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Brodsky v. Board of ManagersNew York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API