Legal Opinion

Smith v. FIRE INS. EXCHANGE OF LOS ANGELES

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2001No. S-00-299PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Bobby L. Smith and Teena M. Smith made demand under a homeowner’s insurance policy to recover for the loss of their house after it was destroyed by fire. When their insurer, Fire Insurance Exchange of Los Angeles, California (Fire Insurance Exchange), denied coverage, the Smiths filed this action in the district court for Webster County. Following trial, a jury entered a verdict in favor of Fire Insurance Exchange, and the Smiths appealed.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Whether a jury instruction given by a trial court is correct is a question of law. When reviewing questions of law, an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pleiss v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Weiner v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Morris v. Rochester Midland Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Smith v. Paoli Popcorn Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Heady v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jay v. Moog Automotive, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Malena v. Marriott International, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Russell v. StrickerNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Breeden v. Anesthesia West, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Springer v. BohlingNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API