Legal Opinion
Kurman v. City of Newark
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 18, 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
124 N.J. Super. 89 (1973)
304 A.2d 768
ROSE KURMAN, TRADING AS TRI-STATE AUTO BODY, AN UNINCORPORATED PROPRIETORSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
v.
CITY OF NEWARK AND DEWEY'S GARAGE, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 2, 1973.
Decided May 18, 1973.
Before Judges LEWIS, CARTON and MINTZ.
Mr. Robert B. Kroner argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. W. William Hodes, Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for respondent City of Newark (Mr. William H. Walls, Corporation Counsel, attorney).
Messrs. Goldman, Goldman and Caprio filed a statement in lieu…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Township of Hillside v. SterninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Marangi Bros., Inc. v. Bd. of Com'rs. of RidgewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- McKim v. Village of South OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
3Cited by11 opinions
- Borough of Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- National Waste Recycling, Inc. v. Middlesex County Improvement Authority & Waste Management of North Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- N.E.R.I. Corp. v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- G & W, INC. v. East Rutherford Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Schnell v. TP. OF MILLBURNNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.