Legal Opinion

Stickney v. Salem

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 6, 1951No. 4008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

It is trué that the prayer of plaintiffs' petition seeks to have all business done and all votes taken at the meeting in question rejected and declared null and void in addition to having the election then held declared illegal. However, because of the allegations therein made and of the specifications filed in clarification thereof their petition can fairly and properly be interpreted as being merely a proceeding to determine the right to hold office of the persons elected at said annual meeting. In that case the petition was properly dismissed because there is an adequate remedy at law to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. CharlesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Soper v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. Oak Cliff Volunteer Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Nickerson v. AimoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  3. Barcomb v. HermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. Pierce v. LangdonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. Perrino v. the Rhode Isd. Bd. of RegentsSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API