Legal Opinion

West v. Continental Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1952No. 13371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

Appellants sued in the state court asserting that a mineral lease executed by them as lessors on August 5, 1947, expired by its own limitations on August 5, 1948, because appellee, lessee, began no drilling operations and paid no delay rental as required by the lease. Appellee removed to the federal court and pleaded that oil was being produced in paying quantities on the anniversary date from an old well drilled under a former expired lease and that such production preserved the later lease.

The parties submitted the case on an agreed statement of facts which was adopted…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Garcia v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. BruhlmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Decker v. KirlicksTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Reed v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Ryan v. KentTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mound Company v. The Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. W. B. Mattison and Harry Hampton v. W. L. TrottiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Holmes v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Mound Company v. The Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API