Legal Opinion

Bowles (Travis) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2013No. 60454Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

(1986) (observing that trial courts retain wide latitude to impose reasonable limits on cross-examination). Bad acts evidence Bowles contends that the district court erred by admitting evidence of an uncorroborated, uncharged, and irrelevant prior bad act. We review the district court's decision to admit or exclude evidence of other bad acts for an abuse of discretion and will not reverse absent manifest error. Ledbetter v. State, 122 Nev. 252, 259,

129 P.3d 671, 676

(2006). The record reveals that Bowles moved to redact the portion of the police interview transcript where he had described "an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Means v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Crawford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Mulder v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ledbetter v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Vega v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API