Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen Concannon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2016No. 11-17634Published

1ConcurrenceBerzon, Circuit Judge

Given Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1656, 191 L.Ed.2d 570 (2015), I am in general agreement with Judge Gould’s opinion for the en banc court (“main opinion”). There are two points, however, as to which the main opinion is terse, at best, and which therefore, in my view, deserve further exploration.

First, I concurred in the panel opinion to highlight my concern about articulating the governmental interests at stake in regulating judicial elections, and write separately here, too, to reiterate the same concern. Wolf son v. Concannon, 750 F.3d 1145, 1160 (9th Cir.2014)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bauer v. ShepardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. New York State Bd. of Elections v. López TorresSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API