Legal Opinion

Harriday v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 1965No. [No. 198, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSybeRT, J.

The appellant, Sterling James Harriday, was convicted of receiving stolen goods under the fourth count of a four count indictment by Judge Men chine sitting without a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, and was sentenced to the Maryland Institution for Men for a term not to exceed three years. He contends on this appeal that his trial was completely void because his representation by trial counsel was so inadequate as to amount to a deprivation of due process of law.

To support this contention the appellant’s counsel on appeal (who was not counsel below) complains that trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Mefford and Blackburn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. HARRIDAY & GAITHER v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Greene v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. State v. RenshawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Sparkman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Hickman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API