Legal Opinion

Succession of Desorme

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1845PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Probates of Pointe Coupée, Cooley, J.

1Opinion of the CourtGarland, J.

This is the third time that this case has been before us. See 15 La. 15. 17 La. 111. After it was last remanded, the heirs of Desorme, who had obtained a reversal of the *475judgment and a new trial, filed a specific opposition to the account presented by the syndic, in which they allege that it does not present a fair and full view of the manner in which he has administered the estate ; that a portion is concealed; and that the proceeds of the sale, and of a crop of cotton, are not fully accounted for. They aver that the account of debts paid is erroneous, and not supported by vouchers or legal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Désormes' Heirs v. Désormes' CuratorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  2. Millaudon v. CajusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
  3. Desormes' Heirs v. Desormes' SyndicSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dejol v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  2. Holmes v. MurdockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. In Re Bank of White CastleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API