Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 10, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a seaman on S.S. Will Rogers, alleges injury from negligence of defendant Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., and seeks recovery citing the Jones Act. Defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that the Jones Act authorizes suit only by an employee against an employer and that defendant Luckenbach was not plaintiff’s employer. Luckenbach was general agent of the United States under contract form G.A.A. 4-4-42. Under Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllister, 337 U.S. 783, 69 S.Ct. 1317, 93 L.Ed. 1692, a seaman cannot sue under the Jones Act for injuries…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. American Auto. Ass'n (Incorporated) v. SpiegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. JP Morgan & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Arnold v. Luckenbach S.S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API