Sisco v. Cheeney
Ohio Supreme Court
Assault and battery by the defendants jointly. Pleas — not guilty, and a justification in defence of the wife, and also in defence of their son.
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
If the tort complained of were by the husband, and wif & jointly, suit should be against the husband alone, for the law intends the whole his act. 2 Com. Dig. 111. If the action *10be against husband and wife jointly for a tort they could not jointly commit, or against the husband alone for the separate act of the wife, and the objection appear on the face of the pleadings, tha 10] *defendant may demur, move in arrest of judgment, or bring his writ of error. 2 Com. Dig. 111. 1 Ch. Pl. 80. So if the action be joint, and the husband he found not guilty, the action fails. Brownl. 209, Yelv. 106. If…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Dodson v. BallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Yarnall's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Robins v. QuinlivenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Huber's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- O'Rourke v. SherwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.