Legal Opinion

P.B. Dirtmovers, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 25, 1994No. 93-16LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

This is an action to recover mine reclamation fees plaintiff alleges it erroneously paid to defendant pursuant to the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (“SMCRA”), 30 U.S.C. §§ 1201-1328. This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff, P.B. Dirtmovers, Inc. (“Dirtmovers”), argues that it is entitled to a refund of the reclamation fees it paid defendant because Dirtmovers is a contract miner with no economic interest in the coal mined and not an operator subject to the payment of mine reclamation fees pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Appalachian Fuels, LLCBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Shibayama v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Wyodak Resources Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Appalachian Fuels, LLC v.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. In re Appalachian Fuels, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API