Legal Opinion
Schulz v. State
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph Harris, J.
The subject of this action is the annual-occurring State budgetary practice generally referred to as "member-items.” Specifically this is an action for a declaratory judgment challenging the constitutionality of a certain $48 million *743appropriation contained in chapter 53 of the Laws of 1992 and reappropriated by chapter 53 of the Laws of 1993, as well as a similar new appropriation made by chapter 53 of the Laws of 1993.
Plaintiffs contend that the ”$48 million lump-sum 'member-item’ ” appropriations contravene the New York Constitution by violating the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hotel Dorset Co. v. Trust for Cultural ResourcesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- People v. TremaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Waldo's, Inc. v. Village of Johnson CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Yonkers Community Development Agency v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.