Neidich v. Fosbenner
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On demurrer to bill.
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
The bill alleges the infringement of letters patent, No. 640.013, for a new and useful improvement in methods of assimilating printed and typewritten work. The defendants demur on the ground that the patent on its face is void for want ■of patentable novelty. Unless the court is satisfied that -by no pos*267sibility can the complainant succeed the suit should not be dismissed in this summary manner. It is true that, upon the face of the pat-eht, there is plausibility in the argument that the method covered by the claims involves only simple changes in the printer’s art within…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Fibre-Chamois Co. v. Buckskin-Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- New York Belting & Packing Co. v. New Jersey Car Spring & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Beer v. WalbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
- Indurated Fibre Industries Co. v. GraceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1892
- Krick v. JansenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gatch Wire Goods Co. v. W. A. Laid-Law Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Neidich v. EdwardsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
- Rose Mfg. Co. v. E. A. Whitehouse Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1911
- Acme Steel Goods Co. v. American Metal Fasteners Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1913