Territory v. Ebarras.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BX
TOWSE, C. J.
Defendants in error were convicted of robbery in the second degree. Motion for a new trial, upon grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and to the evidence, was denied. From this order they bring writ of error.
The errors assigned present two questions; first, whether the verdict, judgment and sentence were contrary to law and to the weight and credibility of the evidence; and second, whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict that the robbery was committed jointly by the three defendants.
The material facts developed at trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Republic of Hawaii v. NenchiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1899
- Territory v. Chung NungHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Territory v. PalaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. CarveloHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. CummingsHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. KekaualuaHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. FosterHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. GabrilloHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.