Legal Opinion

Manok v. Fishman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1973No. Civ. 39777PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON, J.

Plaintiffs Magda, John M. and Richard E. Manok brought an action for an accounting, for declaratory relief and breach of contract against the defendants Fishman, Kramer, and the California Computerized Financial Service, Inc. Defendant Kramer demurred to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint, which omitted the breach of contract cause of action; the trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend. Plaintiffs have appealed the judgment (order) of dismissal.

Our review of the judgment is governed by certain well established principles: the demurrer admits all material…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Day v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Jefferson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Freeman v. DonohoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Berg v. King-Cola, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. David Welch Co. v. Erskine & TulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Dalton v. AustinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Liebersohn v. Ali (In Re Fineberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Stroh v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API