Legal Opinion

Sleight v. Henning

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Washtenaw Circuit, where plaintiffs in error-brought replevin against Henning, Wancllass and Hoops, ^or a quantity of apples. The case is stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

Plaintiff brought replevin for a quantity of apples, and 894 barrels were seized upon the writ. It became a question whether certain apples included in this amount, and which were bought on one day, could be identified and distinguished from the rest; and the question of title also became material. ' The defendant Henning was a witness, and claimed title to a portion of the apples replevied. Having testified that he was ¡resent when the apples were replevied, he was asked whether one George Webster at that time pointed out to the sheriff the apples which said Webster claimed he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bourke v. James & KneelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Standard Oil Company v. GonserMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In Re Sorter's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Walker v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Schneider v. TeppertMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API