Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Earl Curtis

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 18, 1984No. 83-2351PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Curtis appeals from a final judgment of the district court denying his motion to vacate his conviction of bank robbery. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion, filed on March 4, 1980, originally was summarily dismissed. Curtis appealed. This court, in an unpublished order dated March 1, 1982, reversed and remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing on Curtis ineffective assistance of counsel claim. On the basis of the evidence adduced at that hearing, the district court concluded that trial counsel’s representation was competent and effective.

I

Curtis was convicted of bank robbery…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Charles D. Lema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Hurley E. Underwood v. Richard Clark and Attorney General of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Juan A. Acosta-CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API