Legal Opinion

Schride Associates v. Township of Wall

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 3, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BOTTER, P.J.A.D.

The issue decided on this appeal is whether the Wall Township Board of Adjustment (Board) has the power to grant plaintiffs application for bulk and use variances to permit a planned unit development (PUD) on plaintiff’s 42 acre tract even though the township has no ordinance that provides for planned developments.1 The trial court held that the Board of Adjustment had authority to consider such an application and to grant relief, if appropriate. We disagree with that conclusion and reverse.

The facts essential to our disposition are not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Fobe Associates v. Mayor and Council of DemarestSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Rudderow v. TP. COMM., MT. LAURELNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  4. Niccollai v. PLANNING BD. OF THE TP. OF WAYNENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Township v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API