Legal Opinion

State v. Arlt

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1992No. 15676PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WATANABE, J.

Jeffeiy Arlt (Defendant) appeals his September 24,1991 conviction of First Degree Robbery. Concluding that Defendant did not use force “in the course of committing theft” and that First Degree Robbety was thus not proved, we vacate Defendant’s conviction below. However, as there is overwhelming evidence on the record that Defendant committed the lesser-included offense of Theft in the Fourth Degree, we remand the case to the First Circuit Court with instructions to enter a judgment convicting Defendant of Theft in the Fourth Degree and resentencing him…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. People v. TubbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. IaukeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. SorrentinoWyoming Supreme Court · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MalufauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. CordeiroHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Shields v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. MitsudaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API