Legal Opinion

Haxhaj v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs were unable to show that defendant City, whose duty to maintain its roads and highways in a reasonably safe condition is nondelegable (see Lopes v Rostad, 45 NY2d 617, 623 [1978]; McAllen v City of New York, 270 AD2d 43 [2000]), had prior written notice of the alleged defect in the pathway (Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c]), or that either defendant had created the defect through its own affirmative negligence. They further failed to demonstrate that any circumstances exist under which CPC, a contractor, could have owed a duty of care to them (see Espinal v Melville…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Lopes v. RostadNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. McAllen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API