Legal Opinion

Tenn v. First Hawaiian Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1977No. Nos. 75-2452, 75-2453PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellants Luckfield and Tenn appeal from orders denying them discharges in bankruptcy based upon determinations that both had obtained credit by publishing a false statement in writing respecting their financial condition in violation of 11 U.S.C. § 32(c)(3). On appeal they contend that *1357they did not fall within 11 U.S.C. § 32(c)(3) because: They did not meet the “engaged in business” requirement of the statute; the deed that they executed and recorded was not a false statement in writing respecting their financial condition within the meaning of the statute; and they did not fail to…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of James P. Butler, Bankrupt, James P. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Morton Briskin v. William B. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Peter Cottrell Scott v. Norma SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. ApplingSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. In Re Deborah M. Cox, Debtor. Deborah M. Cox v. Paul Lansdowne, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Langer (In Re Langer)District Court, D. North Dakota · 1981
  4. Jokay Co. v. Mercado (In Re Mercado)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1992
  5. In the Matter of Henry Chong Tenn, Bankrupt-Appellant v. First Hawaiian Bank, Creditor-Appellee. In the Matter of Sylvia Tenn Luckfield, Bankrupt-Appellant v. First Hawaiian Bank, Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API