Tenn v. First Hawaiian Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants Luckfield and Tenn appeal from orders denying them discharges in bankruptcy based upon determinations that both had obtained credit by publishing a false statement in writing respecting their financial condition in violation of 11 U.S.C. § 32(c)(3). On appeal they contend that *1357they did not fall within 11 U.S.C. § 32(c)(3) because: They did not meet the “engaged in business” requirement of the statute; the deed that they executed and recorded was not a false statement in writing respecting their financial condition within the meaning of the statute; and they did not fail to…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Matter of James P. Butler, Bankrupt, James P. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Morton Briskin v. William B. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Peter Cottrell Scott v. Norma SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
4Cited by6 opinions
- Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. ApplingSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- In Re Deborah M. Cox, Debtor. Deborah M. Cox v. Paul Lansdowne, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Langer (In Re Langer)District Court, D. North Dakota · 1981
- Jokay Co. v. Mercado (In Re Mercado)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1992
- In the Matter of Henry Chong Tenn, Bankrupt-Appellant v. First Hawaiian Bank, Creditor-Appellee. In the Matter of Sylvia Tenn Luckfield, Bankrupt-Appellant v. First Hawaiian Bank, Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.