Legal Opinion

Parabit Realty, LLC v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*662The defendants Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, EC., and Michael Bonacasa (hereinafter together the HM&M defendants) established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and dismissing the cross claim asserted against them by the defendant B and A Demolition and Removal, Inc. (hereinafter B and A). However, in opposition to the HM&M defendants’ motion, the plaintiffs and B and A raised triable issues of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the HM&M defendants’ motion which were for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Kung v. ZhengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Smith v. South Bay Home Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hernandez v. AsoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API