Parabit Realty, LLC v. Town of Hempstead
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*662The defendants Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, EC., and Michael Bonacasa (hereinafter together the HM&M defendants) established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and dismissing the cross claim asserted against them by the defendant B and A Demolition and Removal, Inc. (hereinafter B and A). However, in opposition to the HM&M defendants’ motion, the plaintiffs and B and A raised triable issues of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the HM&M defendants’ motion which were for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kung v. ZhengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Smith v. South Bay Home Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hernandez v. AsoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019