Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Penrod

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1960No. 30271PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDDY, Judge.

Defendant was charged in City Court No. 2 of the City of St. Louis with resisting a police officer of said City, while the said officer had the defendant under arrest and in custody, which was alleged to be in violation of an ordinance of said City. Defendant was found not guilty in the City Court and the City of St. Louis appealed to the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. There was a waiver of trial by jury in said court. After a hearing defendant was found guilty and he has appealed to this court.

The first point relied on by defendant is that the lower court erred in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Clayton v. NemoursMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. City of Webster Groves v. QuickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. State v. BrowersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. State v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. Russo v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. MathisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. State v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. City of St. Louis v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Kansas City v. BottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Kansas City v. PlumbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API