Legal Opinion

People v. Michael A. C.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1970PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Fuld.

In each of these two cases the defendant was tried by the court alone, without a jury, and adjudicated a youthful offender. On appeal, the Appellate Division treated both defendants alike, reversing each judgment on the ground that section 913-g (subd. 3) and section 913-h of the Code of Criminal Procedure,, insofar as they require a youngster between the ages of 16 and 19 to consent to a trial without a jury in order to render him eligible for youthful offender treatment, are unconstitutional. Since Michael A. C.’s trial began after May 20, 1968, the date on which the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FramptonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. MATTER OF HYNES v. TomeiNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. HaleNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Flippo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  5. United States v. Anibal TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API